Since Rodrik's trilemma of global politics, there have been too many discussions about the way countries must follow around the configurations that result of economic, social and cultural integration. In spite of international legal definitions, here is the measure of sovereignty, that linked with other two indexes of democracy and globalization, it's proved Rodrik's trilemma around the trade off's between these three. What it reveals is the sacrifice around the world of sovereignty and democratic politics due to deeper global integration. Specificly, high income countries have sacrificed democracy and developing countries their national selfdetermination. The globe moves to nationalist states to promote, in one hand, their hegemony (high income states), and in the other, to develop political institutions (low and middle income states). The validation of the existence of this perspective about the political space transfered to external governance implies the begining of the relevance of national identity and sovereign approaches to beign implement in local agendas beyond a simply economic growth approach that can not achieve the implications of global political dynamics that influence all social aspects by interdependence relationships of the sovereign states.
