Background: The increasing costs of managing asthma are due in part to the introduction of new medications, such as leukotriene receptor antagonists. These antagonists interfere with the action of leukotrienes, which are implicated in bronchoconstriction and the formation of airway edema in patients with asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists must be shown to be clinically and economically effective for their clinical use to be justified. Objective: To assess the clinical and economic effectiveness of zafirlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who might benefit from regular anti-inflammatory therapy. Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: 28 outpatient clinics. Patients: 146 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who were 12 years of age or older, had not smoked cigarettes in the previous 6 months, had a smoking history of less than 10 pack-years, had an FEV1 at least 55percent-flag-change of the predicted value with no upper limit, had demonstrated bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and were symptomatic during the 7-day run-in period. All patients were seen every 2 to 3 weeks for 13 weeks. Intervention: 103 patients received zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily), and 43 patients received placebo (twice daily). All patients received inhaled B-agonists as needed. Measurements: Data were obtained from medical examinations, patient questionnaires, and daily diaries. The clinical effectiveness outcomes were days per month without asthma symptoms, limitation of activity, use of B- agonists, sleep disturbance, and episodes of asthma (the latter was a composite measure made up of the first four outcomes plus the occurrence of adverse events). The economic effectiveness outcomes were frequency and type of unscheduled health care contacts, use of B-agonist inhalers, consumption of nonasthma medications, and days of absence from work or school. Results: The zafirlukast group had 89percent-flag-change more days without symptoms (adjusted rates, 7.0 compared with 3.7 days per month; P = 0.03), 89percent-flag-change more days without use of B- agonists (adjusted rates, 11.3 compared with 6.0 days per month; P = 0.001), and 98percent-flag-change more days without episodes of asthma (adjusted rates, 10.1 compared with 5.1 days per month; P = 0.003). They also had 55percent-flag-change (950 CI, 19percent-flag-change to 74percent-flag-change) fewer health care contacts (18.5 compared with 40.7 per 100 per month; P = 0.007) and 55percent-flag-change (CI, 3percent-flag-change to 79percent-flag-change) fewer days of absence from work or school (15.6 compared with 35.0 per 100 per month; P = 0.04). They used 17percent-flag-change fewer canisters of inhaled B-agonists (P = 0.17) and 19percent-flag-change less nonasthma medication (P ygt; 0.2). Conclusions: A daily regimen of zafirlukast added to as-needed inhaled B-agonists is more effective than B-agonists alone in treating mild-to-moderate asthma. The clinical and economic effectiveness of zafirlukast, a potential alternative to inhaled corticosteroids, provides further impetus to use regular 'preventive' therapy in patients with mild- to-moderate asthma.
