1. Inicio
  2. Systematic literature review of cross-protective effect of HPV vaccines based on data from randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence

Systematic literature review of cross-protective effect of HPV vaccines based on data from randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence Artículos académico

  • Perfil
  • Identidad
  • Información Adicional De Documento

Perfil

Resumen

  • Background
    The extent of cross-protection provided by currently licensed bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines versus direct protection against HPV 31-, 33-, 45-, 52-, and 58-related disease is debated. A systematic literature review was conducted to establish the duration and magnitude of cross-protection in interventional and observational studies.

    Methods
    PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published between 2008 and 2019 reporting on efficacy and effectiveness of HPV vaccines in women against non-vaccine types 31, 33, 45, 52, 58, and 6 and 11 (non-bivalent types). Key outcomes of interest were vaccine efficacy against 6- and 12-month persistent infection or genital lesions, and type-specific genital HPV prevalence or incidence. RCT data were analyzed for the according-to-protocol (bivalent vaccine) or negative-for-14-HPV-types (quadrivalent vaccine) efficacy cohorts.

    Results
    Data from 23 RCTs and 33 observational studies evaluating cross-protection were extracted. RCTs assessed cross-protection in post-hoc analyses of small size subgroups. Among fully vaccinated, baseline HPV-naïve women, the bivalent vaccine showed statistically significant cross-protective efficacy, although with wide confidence intervals, against 6-month and 12-month persistent cervical infections and CIN2+ only consistently for HPV 31 and 45, with the highest effect observed for HPV 31 (range 64.6% [95% CI: 27.6 to 83.9] to 79.1% [97.7% CI: 27.6 to 95.9] for 6-month persistent infection; maximal follow-up 4.7 years). No cross-protection was shown in extended follow-up. The quadrivalent vaccine efficacy reached statistical significance for HPV 31 (46.2% [15.3–66.4]; follow-up: 3.6 years). Similarly, observational studies found consistently significant effectiveness only against HPV 31 and 45 with both vaccines.

    Conclusions
    RCTs and observational studies show that cross-protection is inconsistent across non-vaccine HPV types and is largely driven by HPV 31 and 45. Furthermore, existing data suggest that it wanes over time; its long-term durability has not been established.

Área temática

  • Salud y bienestar

autores

  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Alain Luxembourg
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Alfred Saah
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Anuj Walia
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Danielle Badgley
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Darron R. Brown
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Elmar A. Joura
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Glorian P. Yen
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Gonzalo Pérez
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Hanane Khoury
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Margaret Stanley
  • http://research-hub.urosario.edu.co/ontology/vlocal#ExcludedPerson
    Smita Kothari

Publicado en

  • Vaccine Revistas

fecha de publicación

  • abril 15, 2021

Identidad

Identificador de objeto digital (DOI)

  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.076

Identificador único PubMed

  • 33744051

Información adicional de documento

Número de páginas

  • 13

Página inicial

  • 2224

Última página

  • 2236

Volumen

  • 39

Cuestión

  • 16