David Aven v Costa Rica: A step forward towards investor accountability for environmental harm? Academic Article

journal

  • Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law

abstract

  • Investment treaty arbitration has become a laboratory for testing the limits of international corporate responsibility, because arbitrators are often asked to consider instances of investors’ misconduct that compromise fundamental social values and interests. The decision in David Aven v Costa Rica is a glaring example of this case law. The dispute originated from a real estate project halted by local authorities for adversely impacting fragile ecosystems. This case note examines the arbitral tribunal’s approach to environmental harm caused by foreign investors.

publication date

  • 2020-7-1

edition

  • 29

keywords

  • Costa Rica
  • Investment Treaty
  • accountability
  • arbitral tribunals
  • arbitration
  • arbitrator
  • case law
  • compromise
  • corporate responsibility
  • decision
  • dispute
  • ecosystem
  • investor
  • laboratory
  • local authority
  • project
  • real estate
  • responsibility
  • social value
  • treaty

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 2050-0386

number of pages

  • 6

start page

  • 301

end page

  • 306