The Inappropriate Use of GLP-1 Analogs: Reflections from Pharmacoepidemiology Academic Article

abstract

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as a potent therapeutic option for the management of obesity, demonstrating exceptional efficacy in several large-scale clinical trials. Despite their promising therapeutic outcomes, the rising popularity of these agents raises significant concerns, particularly regarding their off-label use by individuals seeking weight loss for aesthetic reasons rather than addressing underlying metabolic health conditions. This article critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs in obesity management. Additionally, it explores the economic implications and ethical challenges associated with the increasing demand for GLP-1 RAs. By addressing these dimensions, this article aims to facilitate informed and responsible decision-making in clinical practice, highlighting the need for individualized patient assessments and careful consideration of both short- and long-term safety risks.

publication date

  • 2024-12-1

edition

  • 3

keywords

  • A1 Receptor
  • Aesthetic Reasons
  • Clinical Practice
  • Clinical Trial
  • Decision Making
  • Decision-Making
  • Economic Implications
  • Ethical Issues
  • GLP-1 Analogue
  • Glucagon Like Peptide 1
  • Glucagon Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist
  • Glucagon-Like Peptide-1
  • Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist
  • Glucagon-like
  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)
  • Health Condition
  • Inappropriate Use
  • Increased Demand
  • Informed Decision-making
  • Large-scale Clinical Trial
  • Long-term Safety
  • Metabolic Health
  • Obesity Management
  • Off-Label Use
  • Off-label Use
  • Patient Assessment
  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Receptor Agonist
  • Responsible Decision-making
  • Safety Risk
  • Therapeutic Outcome
  • Therapeutic Potential
  • Weight Loss

number of pages

  • 8

start page

  • 365

end page

  • 372