It´s in the era of the improvement of the body and the human capabilities, where the dilemma of creating human beings under the tastes and desires of the parents arises, in accordance with the possibilities offered by genetic manipulation. Controlling the conditions in which the individual is born, avoiding or promoting any characteristic, trait or situation that can be manipulated with the help of genetic engineering. The Case of Sharon Duchesneau and Candy McCullough represents a dilemma, they are a an American lesbians couple, who are part of the deaf community, they brought to life their children Jehanne and Gauvin by the technique of artificial insemination, with sperm from a deaf donor. The couple think hearing loss is not a condition that should be treated or corrected, otherwise, it is the characteristic that creates a bond of belonging that has been formed within the cultural awareness of the hearing impaired community which they belong. The objective of the article is to reflect about the purpose of causing a decrease in the sensory capacities of human beings, attending to the tastes of the parents, to allow them to grow up under their own cultural identity that gives them a sense of belonging to a community. The case study is oriented to identify the bioethical dilemmas that involve the use of genetic manipulation techniques in the creation of functionally diverse people, make an analysis from the rules of law, under the recommendations of the declarations and resolutions that make up the «soft law», together with the notions of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, to identify the legal framework of the intervention of the human genome. In this sense, postulate the ethical and legal requirements that imply dysgenesis, as an option offered by technology to give life to human beings under the assumptions of functional diversity.
